A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among future neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national notice adhering to an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods post about René Collier along with the Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, seek to build their family members property. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall beyond the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, significantly in a very sensitive coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, and that is partially developed, is in the right posture. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their look at, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of the sea are equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the location, according to sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-superior h2o all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations, a picture that has because become emblematic of your intensity in the dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Get visual proof from the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Moments documented, describing how the two Adult men entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location became Probably the most placing descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning paperwork, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing link to the area and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple basically trying to make a family property in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Area of Conservation and say that all works are actually carried out according to Qualified advice and accepted programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area Paul Feely and René Collier advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside one another extended after the authorized charges have already been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles like environmental defense and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will count on the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.