A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning potential neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances short article about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to construct their family members house. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result spots are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly within a delicate coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct place. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion as an try and delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to maintain their check out, an allegation which has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal setting up disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic attempts because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the location, according to sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Moments. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-high water in the course of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments, a picture which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic of your intensity with the dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they have been meant to Acquire visual proof with the wall’s place relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from your sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as created, goes outside of what was authorised and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of arranging paperwork, maps, and ailments connected on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their action is motivated by issue for environmental security and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving a private see, insisting rather that it is about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've explained their very long-standing link to the realm as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few only wanting to produce a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works are already performed dependant on Expert tips and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier noted which the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the Actual physical reality from the coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. However the human element remains central: neighbours who should Reside along with each other extended after the legal expenses have already been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building performs at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, even so the implications of the case lengthen beyond that address. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. In addition, it underscores how rapidly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary troubles including environmental protection and assets rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a place of pure splendor and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre of your dispute stands partially built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.